Haha what a funny saying.

The only true concept of “Hell” resides within the Mind of the believer. The illusory notion of Hell is that of a subjective mentation resulting from a misperception of the Totality of All That Is (God) and does not hold a solid identifiable manifestation within existence (in this universe nevertheless).

When the Mind becomes conscious of the level of awareness that is beyond the illusion of duality (separateness), it becomes apparent that the erroneous ideologist nature of Good vs. Evil is a product of different points of observation of the entire whole (Reality) thus illustrating the concept of Hell as an interpretation of the viewer and is not an Absolute.

Lets break it down now:

> The only true concept of “Hell” resides within the Mind of the believer.

Hell is not a place it is a false idea that was created by believing in its existence.

> The illusory notion of Hell is that of a subjective mentation…

The idea of Hell does not calibrate as true. The idea of Hell is a thought.

> …a misperception of the Totality of All That Is (God) and does not hold a solid identifiable manifestation within existence

The origin of the idea of Hell is from a judgment and classification misaligned with truth.

> (in this universe nevertheless).

There might another universe out there where the idea of Hell holds existence.

> When the Mind becomes conscious of the level of awareness that is beyond the illusion of duality (separateness)…

The Mind is swimming through a sea of consciousness in which all levels of awareness are at its view simultaneously, however, it is truly about the Mind wrapping around a particular level of awareness when true realization can become visible. When the Mind realizes at the level of awareness in which duality is an illusion, it becomes known (beyond thought) that hell is merely an idea.

> …it becomes apparent that the erroneous ideologist nature of Good vs. Evil is a product of different points of observation of the entire whole (Reality)

Good vs. Evil is a concept created by the Mind’s interpretation of Reality, false interpretation rather. Because the Mind believes in the concept and is willing to die for it does not mean it is real.

> …thus illustrating the concept of Hell as an interpretation of the viewer and is not an Absolute.

The concept of Hell is just that, a concept (idea) that is either created by the viewer or is taught (forced) into the belief structure in which an infinite amount of naiveté is prevalent.

What is the purpose for the concept of hell? Why even experience an illusory notion?

The vibratory rate, at which the level of awareness is dominant on Earth for humans, is somewhat dense at this moment (October 28, 2005). The concept of Hell serves as an example for the understanding that the Mind interprets Reality, and if the realization of the purpose of the illusory concept is grasped subsequently the movement of awareness through the ethers of consciousness can become visible and applicable for the conscious Mind.

Translation please.

The concept of Hell is an example for the Mind to grow which allows consciousness to evolve through awareness.

Isn’t the “concept” of Hell an illusion?

Yep.

Isn’t it a contradiction by saying the concept of hell is an illusion? How can an illusion be an example? How can something that is not real be a model for growth?

Realizing the falsity of the concept of Hell will provide learning within a new paradigm of awareness (nonlinear), which consequently brings your conscious Mind to a new level of familiarity and allows the realization to become known that you are God (Enlightenment).

Posted on October 28, 2005 in The 700+ Level | Link